Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseOpenClawOpenClaw+21 more

    Dev Team Retrospective Builder

    1

    Builds structured improvement experiments with clear owners, success metrics, and review dates.

    $9.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned
    Dev Team Retrospective Builder

    Dev Team Retrospective Builder

    Example session with this skill installed

    Convert these notes into a retro: Staging was down for 2 days, PRs took forever to get reviewed, the API docs were wrong for the payment story, but we finished the migration on time.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the dev team retrospective

    The sprint successfully completed the core migration goal despite significant friction in environments, code review cycles, and documentation accuracy.

    Sprint Retrospective: Migration & Infrastructure

    ThemeEvidence from NotesImpactDiscussion PromptPossible Experiment
    Environment StabilityStaging down for 2 daysBlocked testing and delayed verificationHow can we minimize the blast radius of staging outages?Implement a "local-first" testing mock for core services
    Review LatencyPRs took a long timeIncreased cycle time and context switchingWhat is the main blocker to starting a review within 4 hours?Designate a "Review Lead" rotation per day
    Doc AccuracyAPI docs were incorrectRework and confusion during payment storyWhere did the source of truth fail during refinement?Require updated spec links before PR approval

    What Went Well

    • Goal Alignment: The primary migration was delivered on time despite technical hurdles.
    • Resilience: The team maintained delivery velocity even with two days of staging downtime.

    Suggested Retrospective Agenda (45 Mins)

    1. Safety & Context (5m): Review migration success and the staging outage timeline.
    2. Theme Deep Dive (20m): Focus on Review Latency and Doc Accuracy.
    3. Experiment Selection (10m): Vote on the Review Lead rotation.
    4. Action Assignment (10m): Assign owners for doc process updates.

    Improvement Experiments

    ExperimentProblemChange to TryOwnerReview PointSuccess Indicator
    Review RotationSlow PR cyclesOne dev assigned to prioritize reviews for 4h[TBD]Next RetroPR wait time < 6 hours
    Spec-First CheckPoor API docsAdd "Docs Updated" checkbox to PR template[TBD]End of SprintZero doc-related rework stories

    Next steps

    • Share the Theme Map with the team 24 hours before the meeting.
    • Nominate owners for the Review Rotation experiment during the session.
    • Add the "Spec-First" checklist to your GitHub/GitLab PR template.

    Disclaimer: This is a facilitation aid. Results should be validated by the team.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Transform raw engineering notes into structured theme maps and action items.Generate blameless discussion prompts for post-incident learning sessions.Audit existing retro notes to eliminate vague goals and individual blame.Create small, measurable process experiments for the next development cycle.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Sprint retrospectives often devolve into vague complaints, blame-shifting, or generic action items like "communicate better." Technical leads struggle to extract actionable experiments from messy Slack notes, incident logs, and verbal feedback.

    What it does

    • Clusters raw sprint notes, blockers, and incident logs into objective, blameless themes.
    • Generates root-cause discussion prompts that focus on process gaps rather than individual mistakes.
    • Designs time-boxed meeting agendas tailored to your team's available schedule.
    • Builds structured improvement experiments with clear owners, success metrics, and review dates.
    • Audits existing retrospective documents to remove blame language and sharpen vague action items.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard LLM prompts often produce generic corporate fluff or overly critical performance critiques. This skill uses a specialized framework to ensure every output is blameless, focuses on small-scale experiments, and produces a structured action register that is actually usable in a tracking tool.

    Use cases

    • Converting rough bullet points from a chaotic release into a structured learning session.
    • Facilitating a neutral, data-driven discussion after a major production incident.
    • Cleaning up low-quality retro notes to make them professional for stakeholder reporting.
    • Scaffolding a 45-minute agile ceremony for a remote engineering team.

    Known limitations

    Does not integrate directly with Jira or Linear APIs. Requires manual input of notes and does not replace a human facilitator for high-conflict interpersonal issues.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 20 days ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed20 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions