- Home
- Skills
- Research & Analysis
- Deep Research: Cited, Cross-Checked Reports
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Deep Research: Cited, Cross-Checked Reports
Deep Research makes your agent work like a careful analyst.
Free
Deep Research: Cited, Cross-Checked Reports
Example session with this skill installed
Research the market for EV charging station management software in Spain. Who are the main players, how do they price, and is there room for a new entrant? Standard depth.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the deep research
Example output, abbreviated. Vendor names and figures are illustrative.
Plan (standard depth, Spain, 2024-2026)
| # | Sub-question | Best sources |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Size and growth of public charging points | national charging registry, EV association reports, Eurostat (A) |
| 2 | Who manages the charge points (CPOs) and what software they use | CPO websites, tenders, press (B/C) |
| 3 | Pricing models of management platforms | vendor pricing pages, procurement docs (C/A) |
| 4 | Regulation that drives demand | BOE, EU AFIR regulation (A) |
| 5 | Gaps and counter-evidence | user reviews, installer forums (D, signals only) |
Bottom line
Demand is growing fast but concentrated: the top 5 operators run most public points and mostly use in-house or large international platforms (confidence: high) [1][2][4]
Pricing clusters in two models: per-connector monthly fee (≈ 5-15 €/connector) or % of energy revenue; installers prefer flat fees (confidence: medium) [5][6][7]
Room for an entrant: yes, in a niche - small municipalities, hotels and parking operators with < 50 points are underserved; EU ad-hoc payment and price-transparency rules raise their compliance burden (confidence: medium) [3][8]
- Biggest risk: consolidation - two acquisitions in the last 12 months [9][10]
Findings (excerpt)
3. Pricing
| Vendor | Model | Public price | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor A (EU) | per connector/month | from 9 € | [5] pricing page, 2026 |
| Vendor B (ES) | % of revenue | 8-12 % | [6] tender doc, 2025 |
| Vendor C (US) | quote only | n/a | [7] |
Conflicting evidence
Installed base: association report [1] vs registry [2] differ by ~14 %; [2] counts only operational public points, so we use [2].
Open questions
Margins of small operators (no public data) - suggest 5 interviews.
Sources
- Annual EV infrastructure report - national EV association, 2026 (B)
- Public charging point registry - Ministry, accessed 2026 (A)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 (AFIR) - EUR-Lex (A)
... 10 sources total, each with URL and date.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Research you can actually base a decision on
Agents often answer research questions from search snippets, a single blog post or memory, with no dates and invented certainty. Deep Research makes your agent work like a careful analyst.
What it does
- Frames the question and the decision it supports: scope, geography, time window, depth (quick brief, standard, deep) and output format.
- Research plan: 3-7 sub-questions, each with the evidence that would answer it and the best sources to check. Runs them in parallel with sub-agents when available.
- Reads sources, not snippets: multiple query phrasings, local-language searches for local topics, recency filters, primary sources first (statistics offices, regulators, filings, papers, docs).
- Source grading A-D with checks for date, origin, method and incentive.
- Verification: key numbers need two independent sources or one authoritative primary source; conflicts explained; fact vs estimate vs opinion separated; never fabricates sources or numbers.
- Bottom-line-first report: answers with confidence levels, findings per sub-question, comparison tables, counter-evidence, open questions and options for the decision, with numbered citations (title, publisher, date, URL).
- Brief mode for a one-page answer.
For market and competitor analysis, technology choices, regulations, due diligence, literature reviews and buying decisions.
Includes
- SKILL.md workflow
- references/plan-template.md - research plan, query patterns, sub-agent brief
- references/source-grading.md - A-D grades, checks, confidence levels
- references/report-template.md - full report and brief formats
Works with Claude Code, Claude (Cowork), Codex, Cursor and any SKILL.md-compatible agent with web search.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Research & Analysis.
Requires web search and page fetching tools. Cannot provide definitive legal or financial advice. Limited to public data accessible via search.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
This skill has been used 7 times.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 3 days ago
- Free with an Agensi account