Decision Memory Pro — Record What Was Decided & Why

Decision record — illustrative **Title:** proposed two-week pilot with rollback condition State: CONDITIONAL / pending satisfaction of documented approval condition; not an unconditional rollout approval. Source: supplied note only. Record date and source date unknown. **Context:** limited support capacity, explicitly stated. Options considered: two-week pilot and full rollout, as stated; no other alternatives invented. **Rationale:** pilot proposed because support capacity is limited. Tradeoffs beyond this rationale are unknown; do not reverse-engineer cost or performance advantages. Authority: Dana is identified in the supplied note as project approver. Actual governance should be verified if this record becomes authoritative. Condition: written rollback plan. Whether additional approval is needed after review is not specified. **Action:** Lee to draft rollback plan. Deadline: not agreed. Implementation state: unknown; no pilot start assumed. Review triggers: rollback plan available; approver confirms condition satisfied and decision state; support capacity changes; proposed pilot scope changes. Proposed triggers are clearly separated from the note’s actual condition. Supersession: retain this record and link any later approval, rejection or revised rollout decision rather than overwriting history. Dissent or reservations beyond the stated condition were not supplied. **Open checks:** exact pilot scope, success criteria, rollback owner, condition-validation process and confirmed authority. **Execution notes:** no external decision log written, task assigned in a system, approval granted or pilot launched.