Works with the AI Agents you already use
Customer Lifetime Value Intelligence Builder
Builds rigorous cohort LTV estimates and CAC comparisons while auditing financial errors in retention reports.
$6.99
Customer Lifetime Value Intelligence Builder
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze this synthetic cohort: 200 acquired users, $50,000 net revenue, 60% gross margin, $2,000 servicing cost, and $10,000 acquisition spend. Use a one-year finite horizon with no repeat evidence.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the customer lifetime value
I have processed the synthetic cohort data. The analysis focuses on observed contribution as there is no repeat-purchase evidence to support future lifetime extensions.
Customer Lifetime Value Analysis
| Cohort | Acquired Customers | Horizon | Revenue/Customer | Contribution/Customer | CAC/Customer | LTV/CAC | Evidence Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic_01 | 200 | 1 Year | $250.00 | $140.00 | $50.00 | 2.80 | Observed Only |
Contribution Bridge
- Net Revenue: $50,000
- Gross Margin (60%): $30,000
- Servicing Costs: ($2,000)
- Total Contribution: $28,000
- Contribution per Customer: $140.00
Horizon and Retention Assumptions
The model uses a finite one-year horizon. Since no repeat-purchase evidence was provided, retention is modeled at 0% for subsequent periods. Future lifetime value is unestimated to prevent unsupported margin guarantees.
Segment Experiment
- Target: General cohort members.
- Hypothesis: Implementing a 30-day re-engagement trigger will increase the observed contribution by 10%.
- Design: Random 10% holdout group (20 users).
Stop Rule: Terminate if servicing costs per customer exceed $160.00 or if refund rates increase by 5% in the treatment group.
Limitations
Calculations are based on historical averages which do not establish individual future behavior. The LTV/CAC ratio of 2.80 is sensitive to the 60% margin assumption; any compression in margin will significantly delay payback.
Next steps
- Provide repeat-purchase data to extend the horizon beyond one year.
- Define specific behavioral segments (e.g., high-frequency vs. high-basket) to refine the experiment.
- Validate if the $10,000 acquisition spend includes all overhead or only direct ad spend.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Spreadsheets and generic LLM prompts often mistake revenue for profit or ignore the reality of acquisition costs. This skill enforces strict financial rigor to calculate Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) and Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) based on actual cohort behavior. It prevents the common trap of using active customers instead of acquired counts, ensuring your unit economics are grounded in reality rather than optimistic projections.
What it does
- Cohort Analysis builds a ledger by freezing specific acquisition windows and tracking performance over defined horizons.
- Contribution Modeling calculates LTV by normalizing net revenue and subtracting gross margins and servicing costs.
- CAC Comparison measures acquisition spend against the total acquired cohort to determine true payback ratios.
- Experimental Design generates segment-specific experiments with holdout groups and stop rules based on behavioral evidence.
- Rigorous Auditing reviews existing drafts to identify P1-P3 defects like revenue-contribution confusion or misaligned retention intervals.
How it works
- Creation Mode starts by ingesting cohort definitions, revenue, margins, and acquisition costs to build a contribution bridge.
- Standardization applies finite-horizon or retention models to ensure period-consistency across all calculations.
- Calculation outputs a structured table comparing LTV and CAC while highlighting payback limitations.
- Audit Mode extracts claims from an existing report, rebuilds the denominators, and generates a defect register with corrections.
Frameworks & tools
This skill requires no external integrations. It processes raw purchase data, retention tables, or redacted documents provided within the chat context.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often fail to subtract servicing costs or align monthly retention rates with annual horizons. This skill follows a specific six-step workflow that prevents "revenue-as-contribution" errors and forces the labeling of all assumptions to protect against misleading financial claims.
Use cases
- Unit Economics Audit to verify if a marketing report is accidentally inflating LTV/CAC ratios.
- Retention Planning to design evidence-bounded experiments for specific high-value customer segments.
- Profitability Mapping to determine if a specific acquisition channel covers its own servicing costs over a one-year horizon.
- Data Cleanup to normalize messy purchase extracts into a standardized cohort ledger.
Known limitations
This tool provides planning estimates only and is not a financial valuation or investment recommendation. It cannot predict individual behavior or guarantee future acquisition returns.
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse All Claude Skills.
Provides planning estimates only, not valuations. Cannot predict individual behavior or guarantee returns. Requires cohort-level data to function effectively.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 3 days ago