crypto scam token risk scanner
A structured risk assessment tool for screening crypto tokens for fraud, liquidity traps, and contract vulnerabilities.
$5
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+21 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentscrypto scam token risk scanner
Example session with this skill installed
Check if 'SafeMoonLegacy' is a scam. I found it on Twitter, the site is safemoonlegacy.io, and here is the contract: 0x123...456. They claim liquidity is locked for 2 years.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the crypto scam token
I have analyzed SafeMoonLegacy based on the contract address and site provided to identify potential rug-pull or control risks.
1. Decision Snapshot
The current evidence indicates high structural risk due to unverified liquidity claims and significant admin privileges. While the website appears professional, the contract logic allows for immediate liquidity withdrawal despite marketing claims of a two-year lock.
2. Inputs & Assumptions
| Item | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Project Name | SafeMoonLegacy | Verified |
| Contract Address | 0x123...456 | Verified |
| Liquidity Lock | 2 Years | Hypothesis |
| Team Identity | Anonymous | Verified |
3. Analysis
| Dimension | Score 0–5 | Evidence | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contract Control | 1 | Owner can change fees to 100% | Prevents users from selling tokens. |
| Mint/Freeze | 2 | Mint function is active | Supply can be diluted at any time. |
| Liquidity Lock | 0 | No time-lock contract detected | Marketing claims contradict on-chain reality. |
| Holder Concentration | 2 | Top 3 wallets hold 45% | High risk of a coordinated price dump. |
4. Key Risks / Gaps
- Liquidity Transparency: No third-party lock (e.g., Unicrypt) was found; the "lock" is currently just a promise.
- Fee Manipulation: The owner can set the "transfer tax" to 100%, effectively trapping all funds.
- Centralization: A single private key controls the entire project's treasury and logic.
5. Recommended Next Move
Primary Action: Avoid interaction until a third-party audit confirms the liquidity lock transaction hash.
- Support Action 1: Request the specific TXID of the liquidity burn or lock from the developers.
- Support Action 2: Verify if the contract ownership has been renounced.
6. Validation Plan
| Question | Evidence Needed | Cheapest Test | Pass Signal | Fail Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is liquidity locked? | TXID of lock contract | Search Etherscan for the hash | Verified lock for 730 days | No hash or < 30 day lock |
7. What Would Change the Conclusion
Evidence of a renounced contract ownership and a verified, irreversible liquidity lock on a reputable platform would move this from "Avoid" to "Proceed with Caution."
Next steps
- Check the project's Telegram for a pinned "Liquidity Lock" transaction link.
- Run the contract address through a specialized tool like RugDoc to see if the "Fee" function is hardcoded.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Retail crypto investors often struggle to distinguish legitimate projects from sophisticated scams. Identifying red flags like hidden mint functions, unlocked liquidity, or anonymous teams requires technical expertise that most users lack.
What it does
- Evaluates projects across eight critical risk dimensions including contract control, liquidity locks, and holder concentration.
- Builds a structured evidence ledger that separates verified facts from marketing hypotheses and unknown risks.
- Calculates risk scores (0–5) for specific technical vulnerabilities like freeze privileges and admin dependencies.
- Generates a concrete validation plan with pass/fail signals for low-cost testing before committing capital.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Generic prompts often return vague warnings or miss technical "honey pot" indicators hidden in contract logic. This skill enforces a rigorous evidence-based workflow that prevents the LLM from hallucinating market data and mandates a "proof-first" analysis style that mirrors professional security audits.
Use cases
- Screening new micro-cap tokens found on decentralized exchanges for immediate rug-pull risks.
- Evaluating the decentralization level of a project by analyzing admin control and minting permissions.
- Performing due diligence on a project's liquidity status and lock duration before long-term holding.
- Identifying marketing discrepancies by comparing official documentation against on-chain evidence.
Known limitations
Cannot access private exchange dashboards or live market data without authorized external tools. Analysis is research-oriented and does not constitute financial or legal advice.
Requires manual input of contract addresses or docs if not provided. Cannot access private broker data or guarantee future price action. Educational research only.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected