Works with the AI tools you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIGitHub CopilotGitHub CopilotGemini CLIGemini CLI+20 more

    Color Team Comment Resolver

    1

    Automated color-team review resolution with strict compliance tracking, disposition logging, and draft patching.

    $19

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    30-day refund guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    0 installsSecurity scanned
    Color Team Comment Resolver

    Color Team Comment Resolver

    Example session with this skill installed

    Resolve these 8 Pink Team comments for Section 3.2.1. Use the provided SOW and proof points. Stay under the 2-page budget. Output the patched draft and the full disposition log.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the color team comment

    Processed 8 comments for Section 3.2.1. 5 accepted and patched, 2 deferred (missing buyer data), 1 rejected (out of scope).

    Comment Disposition Log

    IdColorKindDispositionAnchorRationaleEdit
    C1pinkcomplianceaccept3.2.1.1Missing mandatory shall tagAdded (SOW 3.2.1.1) to paragraph 2.
    C2pinkclarityaccept3.2.1.2Vague mechanism descriptionReplaced "efficiently" with "using AES-256 encryption."
    C3pinkproofreject3.2.1.4No evidence in proof_pointsN/A - Noted for capture team.
    C4pinkcomplianceaccept3.2.1.5Restored modalChanged "will" back to "should" per SOW.
    C5pinkstyleaccept3.2.1.6Conjunction openerRemoved "And" from sentence start.
    C6pinkscopedefer3.2.2.1Wrong sectionHanded off to Section 3.2.2 owner.
    C7pinkpageaccept3.2.1.8Over word countCut 45 adjectives in non-compliance paragraphs.
    C8pinkclaritydefer3.2.1.9Requires SME inputFlagged for technical lead.

    Patched Draft Excerpt (Section 3.2.1)

    The [Offeror] provides data protection at rest using AES-256 encryption (SOW 3.2.1.1). Our centralized management console provides real-time visibility into endpoint status. The system should generate automated weekly reports for the administrator (SOW 3.2.1.5).

    Next steps

    1. Review the 2 deferred items (C6, C8) in the disposition log.
    2. Provide SME input for the technical mechanism requested in C8.
    3. Verify that the 3.2.1.4 rejection is acceptable given the current proof points.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    What you get

    Map reviewer comments to specific SOW requirements and "shall" statements.Enforce page budgets by cutting non-essential prose during comment resolution.Generate mandatory disposition logs for audit trails and proposal management.Prevent unauthorized promotion of contract requirements during Gold reviews.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Reviewers leave dozens of Pink, Red, or Gold team comments that get lost, ignored, or incorrectly implemented, leading to compliance failures and dropped "shall" statements in the final proposal. Manual resolution is slow and prone to silent drops of critical requirements.

    What it does

    • Classifies every review comment as accept, defer, or reject with a mandatory rationale.
    • Patches the draft for accepted comments while preserving SOW structure and compliance tags.
    • Protects against "modal promotion" by maintaining original SOW requirements (e.g., keeping "should" vs. "shall").
    • Enforces page budgets by cutting adjectives and fluff without sacrificing mandatory compliance language.
    • Generates a full disposition log ensuring zero comments are omitted from the process.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often hallucinate facts or silently ignore difficult reviewer notes to keep the prose clean. This skill enforces a strict inventory-before-patching sequence that makes silent drops impossible and prevents the agent from inventing past performance or weaving "win themes" that haven't been vetted.

    Use cases

    • Resolving a high volume of Red Team compliance notes on a technical SOW section.
    • Applying Pink Team stylistic edits while staying under a strict page count.
    • Auditing a Gold Team pass to ensure reviewers haven't accidentally increased the bid's legal scope.
    • Generating a formal comment disposition table for a proposal manager's review.

    Known limitations

    Requires a pre-existing draft and a comment log. It does not write first drafts, repair disjointed outlines, or perform book-level compliance matrix mapping.

    How to install

    Works the same in every agent - Claude, Cursor, Codex, Copilot and 20+ more.

    ~30 seconds
    1. 1

      Download the ZIP

      Free skills download straight away. Paid skills unlock right after purchase.

    2. 2

      Unzip into your skills folder

      Every agent reads skills from one folder on your machine. Drop the unzipped folder in there.

    3. 3

      Ask your agent to use it

      Restart the agent if it was already running. It picks the skill up automatically - no config needed.

    Skills folder by agent

    Click the path to copy it. Create the folder if it does not exist yet.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 1 day ago

    • Passed all security checks, Safe to install

    Listed1 day ago

    Frequently Asked Questions