Collaboration Split Discussion Prep

The problem

Collaborative creative projects often collapse due to vague verbal agreements and forgotten contributions. Creators struggle to transition from messy notes to structured ownership discussions without introducing bias or missing critical details.

What it does

• Generates a neutral contribution record by extracting atomic facts from notes and logs.
• Creates structured discussion agendas focused on resolving identified conflicts and unknowns.
• Builds a decision log with stable IDs to track changes and reconciliations over time.
• Maps every claim to specific source locators to ensure full traceability.
• Identifies explicit status for all items, including "needs-human-decision" and "conflict" states.

Why this beats prompting it yourself

A standard prompt often hallucinates missing details or forces a "fair" resolution that wasn't agreed upon. This skill enforces strict quality gates that preserve uncertainty and trace every output back to evidence, preventing the AI from making unauthorized assumptions about ownership or financial terms.

Use cases

• Preparing for music royalty split discussions using session notes and voice memos.
• Organizing contribution data for co-authored digital products or scripts.
• Creating a neutral audit trail for multi-creator project milestones.
• Documenting unresolved conflicts in creative partnerships before mediation.

Known limitations

Does not provide legal advice or set final financial terms. Requires human input for authority roles and final ownership decisions.