Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIDeepSeekDeepSeekMuseMuse+22 more

    Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token

    1

    Keep long Codex projects on track with separate agent roles and a workflow designed to reduce repeated work and token waste.

    $5

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token

    Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token

    Example session with this skill installed

    $project-flight-control

    MODE: START

    Goal
    Add a customer feedback page to the existing website and save each submission through the current backend.

    Requirements

    • Include name, email, feedback message, and submit button.
    • Reject empty or invalid submissions.
    • Show a clear success or error message.
    • Make the page work on desktop and mobile.

    Constraints

    • Reuse the project’s existing components and API patterns.
    • Do not change the login system or database structure.
    • Do not add unnecessary packages.
    • Do not push, merge, deploy, or change production.
    • Builder implements the work.
    • Verifier independently checks the saved result.
    • If a check fails, rework only the affected part instead of repeating the whole task.

    Deliver a final Project Control Report showing what was completed, what passed, what failed, what was not checked, remaining risks, and the next action.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the codex project flight

    Project Control Report

    Summary

    Status: ACCEPTED
    Alignment: ON_TRACK
    Mode: START
    Goal: Add a customer feedback page and save valid submissions through the existing backend.
    Milestone: Feedback form, validation, submission flow, and independent review.

    Goalkeeper Decision

    The task was limited to one clear milestone.

    The existing page layout, form components, API style, and project structure had to be reused. Changes to authentication, database structure, deployment, remote Git branches, and unrelated pages were kept outside the task.

    Completion required

    • The feedback page works on desktop and mobile.
    • Valid feedback can be submitted successfully.
    • Empty or invalid submissions are rejected.
    • Users can see clear success and error messages.
    • Relevant checks pass.
    • Verifier reviews the same saved version completed by Builder.

    Builder Result

    Builder completed the following work

    • Added the customer feedback page.
    • Reused the project’s existing input, button, and page-layout components.
    • Added name, email, and feedback-message fields.
    • Connected the form to the existing backend submission pattern.
    • Added required-field and email-format validation.
    • Added loading, success, and error states.
    • Added a responsive mobile layout.
    • Added focused tests for validation and submission behavior.
    • Saved the completed work in a local Git commit.

    No unrelated packages or project-wide refactors were added.

    Independent Verification

    Verifier reviewed the saved Builder result separately.

    CheckResult
    Feedback page opens correctlyPASS
    Desktop layoutPASS
    Mobile layoutPASS
    Valid feedback submissionPASS
    Invalid email rejectionPASS
    Empty-field rejectionPASS
    Success messagePASS
    Backend error messagePASS
    Existing affected testsPASS
    Full project test suiteNOT_RUN

    The first review found one issue: a feedback message containing only spaces could still be submitted.

    Instead of repeating the entire task, Goalkeeper returned only the failed validation area to Builder.

    Targeted Repair

    Builder updated the message validation so whitespace-only feedback is rejected and added one focused test for that case.

    Verifier then checked the repaired version again.

    Whitespace-only feedback rejection: PASS
    Affected submission tests: PASS
    Unrelated files changed during repair: No

    Final Result

    The agreed milestone is complete and accepted.

    Completed:

    • Feedback page
    • Responsive layout
    • Client-side validation
    • Backend submission flow
    • Loading, success, and error feedback
    • Focused automated checks
    • Independent verification
    • Targeted repair of the failed area

    Not performed:

    • Remote push
    • Branch merge or rebase
    • Release
    • Deployment
    • Production changes
    • Authentication changes
    • Database-structure changes

    Remaining Risk

    The full project test suite was not run because it requires a separate local test environment. The tests directly related to the changed feedback flow passed.

    Evidence Recorded

    • Goal and task limits
    • Files changed by Builder
    • Local Git commit reviewed by Verifier
    • Commands and checks that were run
    • PASS, FAIL, and NOT_RUN results
    • The failed area and its targeted repair
    • Final accepted status

    Next Action

    The feedback feature is ready for human review.

    Any remote push, merge, release, or deployment must be approved and performed separately.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Keep long Codex projects from getting lost Long Codex tasks can get confusing. The goal changes, work spreads across many files, and it becomes hard to tell what is actually finished. Project Flight Control gives complex work a simple three-role routine. Goalkeeper keeps the goal, limits, completion rules, and current progress clear. Builder works on one agreed task, makes the required changes, runs the relevant checks, and records what happened. Verifier checks the saved result separately and reports missing work, errors, and risks before anything is accepted. The person doing the work does not get to approve their own result. What it helps you do - Turn a large request into one clear goal and manageable milestones. - Keep the work aligned with the original goal. - See what changed, what was tested, and what was not tested. - Continue a project after a break or in a new conversation. - Check an existing implementation without changing it. - Send back only the failed part instead of repeating the whole task. - End each stage with a clear status, blocker, risk, and next action. Four ways to use it START Begin a new complex task. Project Flight Control first checks the current project and helps define the goal, limits, and completion rules. RESUME Continue from the current Git history and saved project records instead of relying on conversation memory. AUDIT Check whether an existing result matches the agreed goal and whether the available tests and evidence can be trusted. STATUS_ONLY View progress, completed work, blockers, risks, and the next step without changing project files. Designed to reduce wasted work Builder starts with the files and tests that matter most. It expands its reading only when the current evidence is not enough. It is instructed to reuse existing project code before creating something new, avoid unrelated changes, run the smallest useful checks first, and rework only the areas affected by a failed review. These rules are designed to reduce repeated reading and unnecessary rework. They do not guarantee a fixed reduction in tokens, cost, or development time. What you receive A typical run ends with a Project Control Report showing: - The current goal and milestone - Work that was completed - Files that changed - Checks that passed or failed - Checks that were not run - Open blockers and remaining risks - The saved project version that was reviewed - The next approved action Best for - Independent developers - One-person companies - Product designers working with Codex - AI builders - Open-source maintainers - People building websites, tools, automations, or digital products - Projects that take several stages or conversations to finish Not needed for Project Flight Control is usually unnecessary for a simple question, a one-line text change, or a very small edit. Before you use it This is an early-access Windows release. It requires Windows 10 or 11, Windows PowerShell 5.1, Git for Windows, and a Codex environment that supports Skills and separate agent profiles. It uses local Git commits and separate work areas to preserve and check project progress. It does not automatically push code, merge branches, publish releases, deploy products, change production systems, or modify external accounts. Strict read isolation has not been reliably verified on Windows. Do not use this workflow as a security boundary for passwords, API keys, customer information, private documents, or confidential source code. AI review does not replace your own judgment. Always review account, payment, privacy, permission, and production changes yourself. Project Flight Control is an independent project and is not an official OpenAI product.

    Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Agents & Orchestration.

    This is an early-access development release, currently version 0.1.0-dev.0. It has not completed the stable-release gate.

    The full workflow is designed for Codex on Windows 10 or 11 and requires Windows PowerShell 5.1 and Git for Windows.

    It requires a Codex environment that supports Skills, separate agent profiles, local Git commits, and temporary worktrees.

    Strict read isolation has not been reliably verified on Windows. Do not use it to protect passwords, API keys, customer information, private documents, or confidential source code.

    A real-model comparison has not yet proven a fixed reduction in token use or development time. Three-role coordination also adds some overhead, so results will vary by project.

    The optional Specialist runtime has not been fully proven and should not be treated as a guaranteed feature.

    Project Flight Control is intended for longer, multi-file tasks. It is usually unnecessary for simple questions or very small edits.

    It does not automatically push, merge, release, deploy, change production systems, or modify external accounts.

    All final decisions still require human review.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 2 months ago

    Permissions

    Read Files
    Browser
    Environment Variables

    File Scopes

    **/*
    .git/**
    %USERPROFILE%/.codex/skills/project-flight-control/**
    %USERPROFILE%/.codex/agents/project-flight-*.toml
    %LOCALAPPDATA%/ProjectFlightControl/**

    Project Flight Control uses local PowerShell and Git commands. It reads the active project, its local Git history, project rules, relevant source files, and tests. It writes only the work approved in the current task, together with local project-control records, commits, and temporary worktrees. The installer places the Skill under the user’s `.codex/skills/project-flight-control/` folder and places the Builder and Verifier profiles under `.codex/agents/`. It reads `HOME` and `LOCALAPPDATA` only to locate user folders and store local installation state and backups. It does not request or read API keys, access tokens, passwords, cookies, or payment information. Browser and network access are not required. The workflow does not automatically push code, merge or rebase branches, publish releases, deploy products, change production systems, or modify external accounts. The current Windows release must not be treated as a confidentiality boundary for sensitive files.

    Listed2 months ago
    Updated27 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    It solves the 'context drift' common in long coding sessions by using a three-role system (Goalkeeper, Builder, and Verifier) to ensure work remains aligned with the original goal and is independently verified before completion.

    This is an early-access Windows release requiring Windows 10 or 11, Windows PowerShell 5.1, and Git for Windows. It is designed for Codex environments that support custom Skills and separate agent profiles.

    Yes, the 'RESUME' and 'AUDIT' functions allow you to pick up from your current Git history and saved project records, making it easy to continue a project across different days or conversation sessions.

    The workflow uses strict task-based reading, reuses existing code, and limits rework to only the failed parts of a review, all of which are designed to minimize unnecessary token consumption.

    You will receive the Codex Project Flight Control workflow and agent profiles, which generate detailed Project Control Reports tracking milestones, file changes, test results, and blockers.

    No, the workflow uses local Git commits and separate work areas for safety; it will not automatically push code to remote repositories, merge branches, or modify production environments.

    New in Agents & Orchestration