- Home
- Skills
- Agents & Orchestration
- Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token
Works with the AI Agents you already use
Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token
Keep long Codex projects on track with separate agent roles and a workflow designed to reduce repeated work and token waste.
$5
Codex Project Flight Control — Agents-Token
Example session with this skill installed
$project-flight-control
MODE: START
Goal
Add a customer feedback page to the existing website and save each submission through the current backend.
Requirements
- Include name, email, feedback message, and submit button.
- Reject empty or invalid submissions.
- Show a clear success or error message.
- Make the page work on desktop and mobile.
Constraints
- Reuse the project’s existing components and API patterns.
- Do not change the login system or database structure.
- Do not add unnecessary packages.
- Do not push, merge, deploy, or change production.
- Builder implements the work.
- Verifier independently checks the saved result.
- If a check fails, rework only the affected part instead of repeating the whole task.
Deliver a final Project Control Report showing what was completed, what passed, what failed, what was not checked, remaining risks, and the next action.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the codex project flight
Project Control Report
Summary
Status: ACCEPTED
Alignment: ON_TRACK
Mode: START
Goal: Add a customer feedback page and save valid submissions through the existing backend.
Milestone: Feedback form, validation, submission flow, and independent review.
Goalkeeper Decision
The task was limited to one clear milestone.
The existing page layout, form components, API style, and project structure had to be reused. Changes to authentication, database structure, deployment, remote Git branches, and unrelated pages were kept outside the task.
Completion required
- The feedback page works on desktop and mobile.
- Valid feedback can be submitted successfully.
- Empty or invalid submissions are rejected.
- Users can see clear success and error messages.
- Relevant checks pass.
- Verifier reviews the same saved version completed by Builder.
Builder Result
Builder completed the following work
- Added the customer feedback page.
- Reused the project’s existing input, button, and page-layout components.
- Added name, email, and feedback-message fields.
- Connected the form to the existing backend submission pattern.
- Added required-field and email-format validation.
- Added loading, success, and error states.
- Added a responsive mobile layout.
- Added focused tests for validation and submission behavior.
- Saved the completed work in a local Git commit.
No unrelated packages or project-wide refactors were added.
Independent Verification
Verifier reviewed the saved Builder result separately.
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| Feedback page opens correctly | PASS |
| Desktop layout | PASS |
| Mobile layout | PASS |
| Valid feedback submission | PASS |
| Invalid email rejection | PASS |
| Empty-field rejection | PASS |
| Success message | PASS |
| Backend error message | PASS |
| Existing affected tests | PASS |
| Full project test suite | NOT_RUN |
The first review found one issue: a feedback message containing only spaces could still be submitted.
Instead of repeating the entire task, Goalkeeper returned only the failed validation area to Builder.
Targeted Repair
Builder updated the message validation so whitespace-only feedback is rejected and added one focused test for that case.
Verifier then checked the repaired version again.
Whitespace-only feedback rejection: PASS
Affected submission tests: PASS
Unrelated files changed during repair: No
Final Result
The agreed milestone is complete and accepted.
Completed:
- Feedback page
- Responsive layout
- Client-side validation
- Backend submission flow
- Loading, success, and error feedback
- Focused automated checks
- Independent verification
- Targeted repair of the failed area
Not performed:
- Remote push
- Branch merge or rebase
- Release
- Deployment
- Production changes
- Authentication changes
- Database-structure changes
Remaining Risk
The full project test suite was not run because it requires a separate local test environment. The tests directly related to the changed feedback flow passed.
Evidence Recorded
- Goal and task limits
- Files changed by Builder
- Local Git commit reviewed by Verifier
- Commands and checks that were run
- PASS, FAIL, and NOT_RUN results
- The failed area and its targeted repair
- Final accepted status
Next Action
The feedback feature is ready for human review.
Any remote push, merge, release, or deployment must be approved and performed separately.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Find more skills like this on the Claude Skills Marketplace, the Codex Skills Marketplace and the Gemini Skills Marketplace, or browse Claude Skills for Agents & Orchestration.
This is an early-access development release, currently version 0.1.0-dev.0. It has not completed the stable-release gate.
The full workflow is designed for Codex on Windows 10 or 11 and requires Windows PowerShell 5.1 and Git for Windows.
It requires a Codex environment that supports Skills, separate agent profiles, local Git commits, and temporary worktrees.
Strict read isolation has not been reliably verified on Windows. Do not use it to protect passwords, API keys, customer information, private documents, or confidential source code.
A real-model comparison has not yet proven a fixed reduction in token use or development time. Three-role coordination also adds some overhead, so results will vary by project.
The optional Specialist runtime has not been fully proven and should not be treated as a guaranteed feature.
Project Flight Control is intended for longer, multi-file tasks. It is usually unnecessary for simple questions or very small edits.
It does not automatically push, merge, release, deploy, change production systems, or modify external accounts.
All final decisions still require human review.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before buying a skill.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 2 months ago
Permissions
File Scopes
Project Flight Control uses local PowerShell and Git commands. It reads the active project, its local Git history, project rules, relevant source files, and tests. It writes only the work approved in the current task, together with local project-control records, commits, and temporary worktrees. The installer places the Skill under the user’s `.codex/skills/project-flight-control/` folder and places the Builder and Verifier profiles under `.codex/agents/`. It reads `HOME` and `LOCALAPPDATA` only to locate user folders and store local installation state and backups. It does not request or read API keys, access tokens, passwords, cookies, or payment information. Browser and network access are not required. The workflow does not automatically push code, merge or rebase branches, publish releases, deploy products, change production systems, or modify external accounts. The current Windows release must not be treated as a confidentiality boundary for sensitive files.