Clip Editorial — Story-First Podcast Clipping

    1

    Find meaningful podcast stories with complete payoffs, context checks, and source ranges.

    $9

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    Clip Editorial — Story-First Podcast Clipping

    Example session with this skill installed

    Use Clip Editorial on the included fictional transcript for an audience of new managers. Recommend complete stories with a useful spoken payoff, explain what to reject, and propose source boundaries. Stop before production. Treat the synthetic timestamps as test data, not verified audio.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the clip editorial

    Recommendation: the changing-priorities story

    This demonstration uses the included fictional transcript with synthetic timestamps. It illustrates the editorial output; it is not a customer result or an audiovisual review.

    Only one candidate passes. The fixture contains two possible moments, so a five-item shortlist would invent material.

    CandidateSource speechDecisionViewer value
    Changing priorities00:30–00:57Recommend for rough-cut reviewA new manager can recognize how their own changing priorities contribute to the delays they blame on others.
    Working late00:00–00:10Hold; no payoff in supplied contextA familiar difficulty is named, but no consequence or change is delivered.

    The recommended story

    • Setup, 00:30: “I blamed my team for missing deadlines.”
    • Turn, 00:40: “Then I checked my messages. I had changed the priority every day.”
    • Payoff, 00:50: “I stopped changing it. We finally finished the project.”

    Fidelity passes for the supplied text. Significance passes because the mistake is recognizable and specific. Payoff passes because the ending supplies both a changed action and a consequence. This example does not establish that managers cause every missed deadline.

    Editorial ratings (0–3): relevance 3, stakes 2, progression 3, payoff 3, opening clarity 2, pacing 2 provisionally. The pacing rating describes the written beats; vocal delivery has not been reviewed. These ratings are judgments, not predicted views.

    Context and boundaries

    The fixture declares processing coverage of 00:00–01:30. The Micro window includes all supplied segments, including the earlier weak candidate and the quiet gap. No additional resolution exists for the working-late passage in that supplied context.

    Optional helper proposal: 00:29.850–00:57.300, from word s1-w0 through s3-w8, with 150ms lead and 300ms tail. This preserves the complete continuous passage. The helper does not verify silence or media identity, and the fixture's word timings are synthetic.

    Hook and next step

    Suggested overlay: “The deadline problem was me.” This is editorial copy, not a quotation. Review the actual source media and its boundaries before cutting. No footage has been watched, cut, rendered, approved or published in this demonstration.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    A memorable sentence is not always a worthwhile clip. Clip Editorial helps your agent find passages that make sense to a new viewer and deliver a reason to care.

    Start with your own timestamped podcast or interview transcript. The workflow surveys the source, inspects shortlisted moments with surrounding context, and tests each against fidelity, significance and payoff gates. The result is a ranked candidate board with source ranges, opening and closing lines, viewer value, weaknesses and review status. Weak candidates are rejected rather than dressed up with a misleading hook.

    Included: editorial instructions, a story-review rubric, an editor handoff guide, fictional worked examples, input-format documentation, and an optional standard- library Python helper for compact transcripts, context windows and word-boundary proposals. Local helper support requires Python 3.10+ and access to packaged files. The instructions also support manual review of timestamped text without Python.

    Developed through real local clipping projects and tested in a Codex/Windows workflow. Other agent runtimes and Agensi MCP delivery of executable resources have not been verified. This is editorial selection, not a full video editor: transcription, media playback, reframing and rendering are separate. No guaranteed virality, view forecasts, bundled videos, paid API dependency, or automatic posting.

    Requires a supplied transcript; no speech-to-text model or media is bundled. Word-level refinement needs the documented JSON schema and word timings. Transcript review cannot verify delivery, speaker identity or safe audio cuts. Python helper is optional and requires Python 3.10+ with accessible supporting files. Agensi MCP executable delivery and other agent runtimes have not been tested. No view or virality guarantee.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 19 days ago

    Software
    Source mediaMedia player
    Optional
    Python 3.10+

    Python runs the optional local helper with the standard library. The media and player are for audiovisual boundary review and are not bundled.

    Permissions

    Terminal / Shell
    Read Files
    Write Files

    File Scopes

    review/**
    *.json

    Helper reads supplied JSON and writes compact transcript, context-window, word-table and boundary-proposal files. Existing same-named outputs can be replaced; use a fresh output folder. No network requests, credential access, media rendering or publishing. Media transcription is a separate step.

    Listed19 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    No. It selects and reviews stories and prepares source ranges. Transcription, reframing, graphics, audio editing and rendering are separate.

    No. It checks editorial completeness, context and viewer value. Ratings are judgments, not reach or retention forecasts.

    The Python helper needs neither. Your agent may have its own usage cost, and transcription is separate.

    The agent can review timestamped text manually. The helper accepts the documented JSON schema; other formats require explicit conversion. Word-boundary refinement requires word timestamps.

    New in Image & Video