Client Feedback to Build Brief

Scope: improve the signed-in submission flow. Preserve email/password login. Public access is deferred by S04. No code or external issue was created.

Decision D01: What generates the receipt and what is its display format? Do not fabricate an endpoint, database field, or number.

T01 — Update submit copy. Sources S01; requirements R01/R04. Acceptance: the signed-in submission control reads exactly “Send request”; login remains required. Discover the control and localization pattern. No file path is known.

T02 — Preserve values after failure. Source S02; requirements R03/R04. Acceptance: given a completed form and a failed submit request, entered values remain available for retry and success is not shown. Proposed extra check for confirmation: prevent duplicate creation on retry.

T03 — Show receipt on confirmed success. Source S02; R02. Blocked by D01 and discovery of the response contract. Acceptance after D01: confirmed success displays its agreed receipt; failure never displays a fabricated receipt.

Suggested product priority: prevent lost input first, receipt confirmation second, copy third. Implementation may begin with T01 independently; T03 stays blocked. Effort, owners, dates, and validation commands are unknown.

Agent handoff: inspect repository instructions, login boundary, submit control, localization, and request state. Implement T01/T02 only if coding is authorized. Preserve login. Hold T03 until D01 is answered. Discover relevant checks and report actual results. Do not deploy or create issues without a separate request.

Coverage: all five requirements map to tickets, a protected constraint, or a deferred item. This is a fictional worked example, not a production run.