Works with the AI tools you already use

    CClaude CodeCCursorCCodex CLIGGitHub CopilotGGemini CLIVVS CodeWWindsurfMManus+14 more

    Claude Feedback Quote Ledger

    by monna

    1

    Capture scattered client comments as a verbatim, source-linked quote ledger before revision decisions distort the evidence.

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    See it in action

    You say

    Create a quote ledger from two sources. Email — round 2: “Please move the pricing note above the table. Could we also use the earlier headline?” Chat note from Maya: “The pricing section is approved.” Preserve exact wording and flag missing references. Redact Maya's name.

    Your agent does

    ARTIFACT: CLAUDE-FEEDBACK-QUOTE-LEDGER MODE: SOURCE-BOUND

    SOURCE REGISTER | SRC-01 | Email — round 2 | NOT SUPPLIED | Email | NOT SUPPLIED | — | | SRC-02 | Chat note | [REDACTED] | Chat | NOT SUPPLIED | Name redacted |

    QUOTE LEDGER | SRC-01-Q01 | SRC-01 | Please move the pricing note above the table. | EXPLICIT REQUEST | pricing note / table | ANCHORED | NONE | | SRC-01-Q02 | SRC-01 | Could we also use the earlier headline? | QUESTION | headline | MISSING ANCHOR | NONE | | SRC-02-Q01 | SRC-02 | The pricing section is approved. | APPROVAL-LIKE | pricing section | ANCHORED | NONE |

    OPEN CONTEXT GAPS

    • SRC-01-Q02: “earlier headline” does not identify a version or source.

    BOUNDARY No contradiction resolution, scope decision, prioritization, implementation plan, or client reply was produced.

    What you get

    Extract verbatim client quotes from raw meeting transcripts.Map scattered feedback to specific source documents and authors.Identify ambiguous references and missing context in client requests.Maintain a loss-resistant record of requirements before planning revisions.

    About this skill

    Capture the evidence before planning revisions

    Client feedback usually arrives across email, chat, document comments, and meeting notes. Copying it into a task list too early can erase the exact wording, source, and missing context.

    Claude Feedback Quote Ledger creates a source-bound intake artifact before revision planning begins. It registers every supplied source, splits comments into atomic items, preserves verbatim wording, distinguishes visible requests from questions, and flags unresolved references without inventing the missing context.

    What you receive

    • Stable source and item IDs
    • Exact quotes with no silent polishing
    • Conservative request, question, observation, and approval-like labels
    • Explicit artifact targets when visible
    • Missing-anchor flags for phrases such as “the earlier one”
    • User-controlled redaction handling
    • Coverage counts and seven quality gates
    • A clear boundary against scope decisions and premature prioritization

    Best for

    • Freelancers collecting revision notes from several channels
    • Agencies preparing feedback before assigning work
    • Claude project users who need traceable client evidence
    • Teams worried summaries lose exact wording

    Boundaries

    This focused entry product handles evidence capture only. It does not reconcile contradictory reviewers, decide scope, prioritize changes, rewrite the deliverable, or draft a client reply.

    How to install

    Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean today

    Listedtoday

    Creator

    monna
    monna

    6 skills on Agensi

    I design high-value AI prompts, reasoning systems, and practical workflows for people who need more than generic outputs. My work focuses on turning complex tasks into structured AI systems for research, education, RAG, validation, decision-making, systems engineering, and business workflows. I build prompts that are designed to: • reduce ambiguity and weak reasoning • ground outputs in evidence and clear constraints • detect gaps, contradictions, and misconceptions • guide AI through complex multi-step decisions • produce structured, usable deliverables instead of generic answers I’m especially interested in RAG, ontology-driven reasoning, evidence validation, adaptive learning, and AI workflow design. If you’re looking for prompts that do real analytical work—not just better wording—you’re in the right place.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Popular in Business & Operations