Claude Client Feedback Resolution Room

Client feedback should become decisions—not another messy thread

Client Feedback Resolution Room reconciles the approved brief, current draft, and feedback scattered across email, chat, comments, transcripts, and documents. It preserves the original wording, exposes contradictions, separates true revisions from possible scope changes, and produces a controlled path to the next version.

What the skill produces

• A source register that shows which brief, draft, message, and reviewer each conclusion came from.
• An atomic feedback ledger with stable IDs instead of vague bundled comments.
• A conflict map for incompatible requests, mixed versions, missing authority, and hidden dependencies.
• Operational scope classification: In Scope, Clarification Required, Change Request Candidate, Not Actionable, or Duplicate/Superseded.
• An ordered revision patch plan with invariants, dependencies, verification, and rollback points.
• A professional client reply draft that groups decisions and asks only the questions that block progress.
• An observable acceptance checklist for the revised artifact.
• A fidelity receipt showing what is preserved, changed, deferred, or unknown.

Why this is a paid workflow

This is not a generic “summarize the feedback” prompt. The package contains dedicated reference protocols for source authority, atomic feedback normalization, contradiction handling, revision-scope control, patch planning, and acceptance testing. Ten forward-test cases cover clean revisions, vague requests, conflicting reviewers, mixed versions, new deliverables, duplicate feedback, missing baselines, private data, and authority ambiguity.

Best for

• Content creators handling brand or client revisions.
• Freelancers receiving feedback across several channels.
• Agencies managing multiple reviewers and approval rounds.
• Studios protecting approved work while resolving contradictory comments.
• Consultants who need a clean record of decisions and next actions.

Boundaries

The skill does not provide legal advice, interpret contract enforceability, negotiate fees, send messages, edit files automatically, or decide commercial concessions. It never invents approval authority, deadlines, pricing, or scope terms. Possible scope changes are presented for the user’s decision.