Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    Citation & Reference Integrity Manager AMA, APA & Vancouver

    1

    Verify citation metadata, audit claim-source alignment, and format references in AMA, APA, or Vancouver style.

    $28.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Citation & Reference Integrity Manager AMA, APA & Vancouver

    Citation & Reference Integrity Manager AMA, APA & Vancouver

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit these three references for APA 7th style and check the claim against the provided text snippet.
    Claim: Smith (2022) found a 20% increase in latency.
    Ref: Smith, J. (2021). Systems. Vol 2.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the citation & reference

    I have audited the provided references and claim against the APA 7th edition guidelines.

    Scope: 2 references, 1 claim.
    Style: APA 7th Edition.
    Status Summary: 1 MISMATCH, 1 INCOMPLETE, 1 CLAIM-SOURCE CONCERN.

    Citation Audit & Reference Log

    IDStatusField IssuesFindings
    R001MISMATCHYear, TitleProvided as 2021; claim cites 2022. Title 'Systems' is incomplete.
    R002INCOMPLETEDOI, PublisherMissing required APA 7th metadata for electronic sources.

    Claim-Source Matrix

    CitationClaimSource SupportStatus
    Smith (2022)20% increase in latencySource text (Smith 2021) reports 12% latency increase in pilot phase only.CLAIM-SOURCE CONCERN

    Corrected Reference Draft

    Smith, J. (2021). Systems architecture and performance metrics. Journal of Computing, 2(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sys.2021.04.002

    In-Text Linkage Issues

    • Uncited in list: The citation "Smith (2022)" in your text does not match the bibliography entry "Smith (2021)".
    • Missing Entry: No reference found for the secondary claim regarding latency metrics.

    Next steps

    1. Confirm if the 2022 Smith paper is a different publication or a typo for the 2021 version.
    2. Update the latency claim to reflect the 12% figure found in the source text.
    3. Provide the DOI for R002 to complete the APA formatting.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Academic and technical manuscripts often suffer from citation drift, missing metadata, and style inconsistencies that lead to desk rejections. This skill automates the tedious audit of bibliographies and in-text citations to ensure every claim is backed by a verifiable source. It identifies gaps where a reference list fails to match the manuscript text and flags metadata mismatches in authors, titles, and DOIs.

    What it does

    • Inventory & Linkage maps every in-text citation to its bibliography entry to find orphans or missing items.
    • Metadata Verification audits fields like authors, volume, and PMID, marking them as VERIFIED, MISMATCH, or MISSING.
    • Claim-Source Alignment checks if the source text actually supports the population, outcome, or magnitude cited.
    • Style Formatting generates a corrected draft in AMA, APA, or Vancouver styles based on specific edition rules.
    • Issue Classification categorizes findings into high-priority buckets like CLAIM-SOURCE CONCERN or FORMAT ISSUE.

    How it works

    1. Submit your manuscript or reference list along with the desired style (e.g., APA 7th Edition) and any available source text.
    2. Review the Audit which provides a summary of metadata statuses and a claim-source matrix for verified evidence.
    3. Execute Draft to receive a formatted reference list and a change log highlighting every proposed modification.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is framework-agnostic and processes raw text, Markdown, or LaTeX manuscripts. It follows official AMA, APA, and Vancouver style guides for scholarly publishing.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard prompts often hallucinate missing DOI links or silently "fix" metadata with plausible-sounding fake data. This skill uses a strict verification logic that preserves original entries and explicitly labels items as UNVERIFIED rather than guessing.

    Use cases

    • Auditing medical manuscripts for AMA style compliance before journal submission.
    • Verifying that technical white paper claims match the data in cited PDF excerpts.
    • Resolving citation numbering mismatches in complex Vancouver-style documents.
    • Cleaning up messy BibTeX or reference lists compiled from multiple contributors.

    Known limitations

    Does not perform live external database queries unless tool access is provided. Cannot prove a source is fabricated if it is not found in internal records.

    Requires manual human review of all UNVERIFIED flags. Limited to AMA, APA, and Vancouver styles. Cannot verify claim alignment without access to the cited source text.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 24 days ago

    Permissions

    Terminal / Shell
    Read Files
    Listed24 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The skill identifies 'orphaned' citations (entries in the bibliography not cited in the text) and 'missing' citations (claims in the text with no matching bibliography entry), ensuring a 1:1 mapping across your entire document.

    The skill accepts raw text, Markdown, and LaTeX formats, making it compatible with a wide range of academic workflows from Overleaf to standard word processors.

    Unlike standard AI prompting, this skill uses a strict verification logic that flags items as 'UNVERIFIED' instead of hallucinating plausible-sounding DOIs or author names.

    Yes, you can submit source excerpts alongside your manuscript; the skill will then audit your claims to ensure the cited population, outcomes, and data magnitudes accurately reflect the source text.

    Your purchase includes the full skill logic for citation auditing and formatting in AMA, APA, and Vancouver styles, along with any future version updates released to the marketplace.

    While the skill excels at formatting and auditing internal logic, it requires manual tool configuration or provided text excerpts to verify sources against live external databases like PubMed or CrossRef.

    New in Technical Documentation