- Home
- Skills
- Research & Analysis
- citation ready content builder
citation ready content builder
Evidence-grounded content drafter that maps claims to sources and flags citation gaps for review.
$5
Works with the AI Agents you already use
citation ready content builder
Example session with this skill installed
Draft a 500-word report on the impact of remote work on junior developer mentorship. Objective: build trust with CTOs. Include an evidence map and identify any citation gaps.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the citation ready content
I have completed the research and drafting process for your report on junior developer mentorship in remote environments. I prioritized peer-reviewed studies and industry reports from the last three years to ensure data accuracy.
Junior Developer Mentorship in the Remote Era: Evidence Report
Brief: Analysis of remote work's impact on junior dev growth to build CTO trust. 500 words, cited, answer-first.
Executive Summary
Remote work significantly slows "passive learning" for junior developers but can be mitigated by structured, asynchronous documentation and deliberate pairing (Source 1, Source 3). The primary risk is the loss of spontaneous observation, which historically accounted for a high percentage of junior skill acquisition (Source 2).
Evidence Map
| Claim | Source | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Junior devs in remote roles take 20% longer to reach mid-level competency. | Source 2: 2023 Engineering Productivity Survey | [SUPPORTED] |
| Asynchronous code reviews serve as a primary learning tool in 70% of remote teams. | Source 1: State of Remote Work 2024 | [SUPPORTED] |
| Remote mentorship increases retention by 15% compared to no mentorship. | [UNSUPPORTED] | [RISKY] |
Citation Gap Report
- Retention Data: The claim that remote mentorship increases retention by 15% lacks a specific primary source.
- Risk: Moderate.
- Recommendation: Rewrite to state "preliminary industry surveys suggest a positive correlation" or remove until HR data is provided.
Mental Health Impact: Insufficient data found on the specific correlation between remote pairing and junior dev burnout rates.
Readiness Check
- Factual support: PASS (Material claims are cited).
- Clarity: PASS (Main takeaway: Structure beats spontaneity in remote growth).
- Attribution: PASS (All URLs resolved).
- Publication readiness: FAIL (One [RISKY] claim requires revision or removal).
Next steps
- Review the [RISKY] retention claim in the Evidence Map.
- Approve the final draft for conversion into the suggested social post.
- Provide internal HR metrics if you wish to close the [UNSUPPORTED] gap.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
Drafting research-backed content often leads to citation drift, where claims lose their connection to original sources. Developers and researchers struggle to identify which parts of a report are factually solid and which rely on unverified assumptions.
What it does
- Identifies and ranks primary sources based on credibility and recency.
- Creates an evidence map pairing every factual claim with a specific source ID.
- Generates a citation gap report to flag unsupported or risky assertions.
- Drafts answer-first content with inline citations and confidence levels.
- Produces repurposable assets like social posts and FAQs from approved evidence blocks.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
Standard prompts often hallucinate citations or bridge logic gaps with unsourced fluff. This skill enforces a rigorous evidence mapping phase that makes the paper trail explicit, ensuring every claim is either backed by data or explicitly flagged as an assumption for human review.
Use cases
- Writing technical whitepapers that must survive legal or compliance audits.
- Converting industry reports into cited blog posts and social threads.
- Drafting internal briefs where distinguishing between data and assumptions is critical.
- Performing gap analysis on existing drafts to find where more research is needed.
Known limitations
Requires active web search and extraction tools. Does not perform creative fiction or opinion pieces where evidence is not required.
Requires web_search and web_extract capabilities. Sources older than 3 years are discarded by default unless canonical. Content requires human subject-matter expertise for final verification.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 1 month ago