Brand Asset Proof — Campaign Export QA

Illustrative report structure; no image files were opened, measured, or uploaded.

Release set: launch-a.png and launch-b.png, both intended for a square social feed placement. Claimed guide rules: 1080 × 1080 pixels and 48 pixels of logo clear space. Because neither the approved guide nor the exported files are attached, the guide version, rule citation, pixel dimensions, logo boundary, and spacing method are all unavailable. The matrix therefore lists each asset and both named checks as HOLD, with “missing approved source” and “export unavailable” as the specific evidence gaps. It does not manufacture a 64-pixel or 32-pixel measurement from the filenames.

Overall verdict: HOLD. Next proof: provide the approved guide page that defines the dimension and safe-area rule, the exact exported files, and the intended placement. Then inspect the exports at their actual size, measure the logo clearance where boundaries are reliable, and cite the file/frame used. A measured mismatch would become REVISE; a supported pass would apply only to the checked rules. Palette, font identity, and contrast would remain unverified unless applicable approved rules and inspectable pixels exist. This illustrates the fail-closed review behavior, not a completed asset audit.