Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    Assignment Rubric Compliance Auditor

    1

    Audit academic assignments against rubrics to identify missing criteria, verify constraints, and prioritize revisions.

    $9.99

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned
    Assignment Rubric Compliance Auditor

    Assignment Rubric Compliance Auditor

    Example session with this skill installed

    Audit this essay draft against the attached rubric. The rubric says "Critical Analysis" is 40% of the grade. Word limit is 2,000 excluding references. Check if I've met the criteria.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the assignment rubric compliance

    I have audited your essay draft against the provided rubric and assignment brief. The draft is currently 1,850 words (excluding the bibliography), which falls within your 2,000-word limit.

    Assignment Audit Report

    1. Executive Summary

    The draft is structurally sound but carries high risk in the

    Critical Analysis section (40% weight). While your arguments are clear, the evidence mapping shows a lack of counter-arguments, which is a specific requirement for the "Distinction" tier in your rubric.

    2. Rubric-to-Work Audit

    CriterionWeightStatusEvidence/LocationRecommended Revision
    Critical Analysis40%Partially CompliantSection: "Market Impact"Add a paragraph addressing the limitations of the current model to meet the 'evaluation' criteria.
    Research Quality30%CompliantThroughout; 15 citations foundNone; citations are consistent with APA 7th style.
    Structure20%CompliantHeadings used correctlyEnsure the 'Conclusion' directly links back to the 'Thesis Statement'.
    Formatting10%Needs VerificationFont/SpacingVisual spacing cannot be confirmed from text extract; check 1.5 line spacing manually.

    3. Word-Count Audit

    • Rule: 2,000 words max (excluding references).
    • Current Estimate: 1,850 words.
    • Margin: 150 words remaining.
    • Status: Compliant.

    4. Prioritized Revision Checklist

    P1 — Must fix: Insert counter-argument in the "Market Impact" section. The rubric explicitly requires "alternative perspectives" for marks above 70%.

    P2 — High impact: The claim on page 3 regarding "2023 growth stats" lacks a citation. Add the Smith (2023) reference.

    • P3 — Improve: The transition between paragraph 4 and 5 is abrupt. Add a linking sentence.

    Next steps

    1. Draft the counter-argument for the Analysis section to secure the 40% weighting.
    2. Insert the missing citation for the 2023 growth statistics.
    3. Manually verify that your margins are set to 2.54cm as per the formatting brief.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    Academic submissions often fail not because of poor ideas, but because they missed a hidden requirement in the rubric or exceeded a strict word count. This skill functions as a rigorous compliance auditor for university and college students, systematically mapping their drafts against official marking criteria to catch omissions before they affect the final grade.

    What it does

    • Criterion mapping identifies where each rubric requirement is addressed in the text or flags it as missing.
    • Evidence verification evaluates the strength of claims and flags statements that require citations or better supporting data.
    • Structural auditing compares the assignment's layout against mandatory sections, headings, and required appendices.
    • Constraint checking calculates word counts against specific exclusion rules and verifies visible formatting like font size and citation style.
    • Prioritized reporting generates a revision queue ranked by rubric weight and impact on the final submission.

    How it works

    1. Extract requirements by parsing the assignment brief and rubric into a list of mandatory and advisory rules.
    2. Inspect the work to identify claims, sections, and formatting indicators within the provided draft.
    3. Map compliance by assigning a status to every criterion: Compliant, Partially Compliant, Missing, or Needs Verification.
    4. Generate the audit in a structured report including a word-count analysis, citation flags, and a prioritized revision checklist.

    Frameworks & tools

    This skill is designed for high-context LLMs capable of processing long-form academic documents, rubrics, and PDF/text extracts.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Standard prompts often give generic feedback or hallucinate that a requirement is met just because a heading exists. This skill enforces a "status-based" audit that requires specific evidence mapping, ensuring you never overlook a high-weight criterion hidden in the professor's fine print.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing a final capstone draft against a complex, multi-page grading rubric.
    • Checking a research paper for unsupported factual claims and citation consistency.
    • Verifying word-count compliance when specific sections like bibliographies must be excluded.
    • Ensuring a technical report includes all mandatory sections required by the brief.

    Known limitations

    Formatting audits are limited to what is visible in extracted text; layout and margin precision may require manual verification. It cannot verify the truth of external sources or access gated databases.

    Cannot verify facts in external sources or inspect visual layout precision like margins. Word count is an estimate based on provided text. Does not guarantee grades or academic integrity compliance.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 11 days ago

    Permissions

    No special permissions declared or detected

    Listed11 days ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The skill acts as a rigorous pre-grading auditor, mapping your draft directly against your specific rubric to identify missing sections, citation gaps, and word-count violations before you submit.

    The skill works with any high-context LLM capable of processing long-form documents; simply upload your draft and your rubric as text or PDF files to begin the audit.

    You will receive the proprietary logic for the auditor, a structured template for rubric ingestion, and a guide on how to interpret the prioritized revision reports.

    While it accurately tracks word counts and citation placement, it cannot verify the physical margins or exact font kerning of a PDF; you should always perform a final visual check for layout-specific formatting.

    No, the skill is a compliance tool that compares your work to your provided rubric; it does not have access to your school's private database or specific grading history.