Article Deconstructor / 信息拆解器

Note: analysis is slow, because each fact is checked against sources. You can send several articles at once. Keep your computer on and online while it runs. 提示：拆解速度较慢，因为每条事实都要查来源。建议一次发送多篇文章，并保持电脑联网、开机运行。

Article Deconstructor

Paste an article, or a link to one, and get a short report. It separates facts from opinions and predictions, checks key facts against sources, and points out hidden premises, unstated reasoning steps and loaded wording. It does not tell you whether the article is good or bad. It tells you what the sources say, and you decide.

What you get

• An overview by default: an audit opinion on the checked facts, the counts, and up to 3 of the most important issues. Each issue quotes the article, so you can find the place.
• Reply "focused" for the main issues, or "full" for everything.
• Five fixed labels for facts: ✅ Accurate · ⚠️ Measure or scope shift · ❌ Does not match source · 🔍 No source found · ❓ Undetermined (with a reason).
• Different standards for different texts: news is checked for accuracy against the most credible source, ideally official first-hand data. Analysis and opinion pieces (adverts and papers included) get the full argument breakdown. Reviews of film, art, music, sport and similar have plot summary skipped, and feelings and evaluations are labelled, not argued with.
• Reports in the language you ask in. Works on articles in any language.

What it does not do

• It does not analyse content whose purpose is to evaluate a specific politician, government, political party or state body. Policies can be analysed.
• It does not judge whether a religion or its beliefs are true. Religion as history, thought or culture can be analysed.
• It does not analyse content meant to help someone commit a crime or cause harm.
• It does not analyse chat logs, code or other texts that do not inform or argue.
• It does not give an overall true or false verdict on an article.
• "No source found" does not mean false. Verification depends on what can be found publicly. Paywalled and offline sources may be out of reach.
• The overview checks up to 5 key facts, not every fact. Ask for "full" to check all of them.

Requirements

• An agent with web search. Without it, the skill does not check facts and says so.
• It runs in your own agent, with your own model and search.

Feedback and issues: https://github.com/PAOLO12321/article-analyzer/issues

信息拆解器

粘贴文章或链接，得到一份简短报告。它把事实、观点和预测分开，用来源核查关键事实，并指出隐藏前提、没说出来的推理步骤和渲染性措辞。它不评价文章好坏，只告诉你来源怎么说，判断由你来做。

你会得到

• 默认是速览：已核查事实的审计意见、各类数量，以及最多 3 个最重要的问题。每个问题都引用原文，方便你找到位置。
• 回复“重点”查看主要问题，回复“完整”查看全部。
• 事实核查用五个固定标签：✅ 准确 · ⚠️ 口径不一致 · ❌ 与来源不符 · 🔍 未找到来源 · ❓ 无法判定（附理由）。
• 不同文本用不同标准：新闻只看准确性，找最可信的来源，优先官方一手数据；分析和观点文章（包括广告和论文）做完整的论证拆解；影评、艺术、音乐、体育等评论跳过剧情复述，感受和评价只做标注，不做反驳。
• 用你提问的语言写报告，可以分析任何语言的文章。

它不做的事

• 不分析目的是评价具体政治人物、政府、政党或国家机构的内容。政策可以分析。
• 不判断宗教或其信仰是否正确。宗教作为历史、思想或文化可以分析。
• 不分析目的是帮人犯罪或造成伤害的内容。
• 不分析聊天记录、代码等不是在陈述信息或提出论点的文字。
• 不对整篇文章给出真或假的结论。
• “未找到来源”不等于是假的。核查依赖可公开搜索的来源，付费墙后和线下的来源可能查不到。
• 速览最多核查 5 条关键事实，不是全部。需要全部核查请回复“完整”。

使用条件

• 你的 AI 助手需要能联网搜索。没有搜索时，本工具不核查事实，并会说明。
• 在你自己的 AI 助手里运行，使用你自己的模型和搜索。

反馈：https://github.com/PAOLO12321/article-analyzer/issues