Works with the AI Agents you already use
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex CLI
Muse
Dots+22 moreClaude CodeCursorCodex CLIMuseDots
OpenClaw
Manus
Grok
Grok Bot+18 agentsAmazon Review Gold Miner — Review Intelligence
Turn Amazon review corpora into evidence-grounded product, listing, quality, and customer insights.
$9.99
Amazon Review Gold Miner — Review Intelligence
Example session with this skill installed
Analyze this explicitly synthetic, 10-review sample for a travel organizer. Five sample reviews mention cables being difficult to find quickly; three praise the compact size; two report a zipper snag; one says the listing led them to expect water resistance, which is not a confirmed product feature. These example theme counts overlap because one review can mention multiple aspects. Show the corpus denominator and caveat that the sample is synthetic, classify aspects and root-cause hypotheses, suggest validation steps and product/listing/support actions, identify product-truth gaps, and state what cannot be concluded. Do not invent quotes, claim representativeness, or treat review statements as verified product facts.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the amazon review gold
Review Intelligence Brief — Synthetic Travel Organizer Sample
Corpus: 10 explicitly synthetic review examples. This is a demonstration dataset, not real customer feedback or a representative sample. Themes may overlap, so counts do not sum to 10.
Aspect findings
| Theme | Count / denominator | Evidence class | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hard to locate cables quickly | 5/10 | SYNTHETIC-SAMPLE | Candidate retrieval/friction issue; validate by observed task tests |
| Compact size praised | 3/10 | SYNTHETIC-SAMPLE | Possible benefit worth preserving; check fit and capacity trade-offs |
| Zipper snag reported | 2/10 | SYNTHETIC-SAMPLE | Potential quality signal; inspect product samples, failure conditions, and batch history |
| Water-resistance expectation mismatch | 1/10 | SYNTHETIC-SAMPLE | Possible listing/expectation gap; no confirmed water-resistance feature |
Root-cause hypotheses to test
- Cable retrieval may relate to compartment layout or visibility; observe users packing and retrieving items before redesign.
- Zipper snag may relate to hardware, seam alignment, overfilling, or use conditions; inspect returned samples and request supplier QC records. Do not label a confirmed defect from two synthetic reports.
- The expectation mismatch may come from copy, imagery, customer inference, or another source. Audit all claims and images against the product specification; do not add a resistance claim without defined test evidence.
Recommended actions
Product/QC: run repeatable zipper-cycle and load tests on multiple samples and lots; record conditions and failure rate.
2.
Usability: test cable retrieval with target users and compare a removable pouch or visible elastic loops as hypotheses. Preserve compactness while measuring capacity trade-offs.
3.
Listing/support: review product copy and imagery for implied water resistance; clarify confirmed material and use limits, and prepare a factual support answer.
4.
Next review analysis: obtain a complete, dated, variant-matched export; deduplicate, inspect sampling, compare cohorts, and retain exact denominators.
Confidence: INSUFFICIENT for real-world prevalence or root cause. These illustrative counts cannot establish defect frequency, market demand, causation, return risk, or a business outcome. No customer quote or product fact is asserted.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
Amazon Review Gold Miner transforms authorized customer reviews and feedback into decision-grade product intelligence, not just a sentiment summary. It validates marketplace, product and variant identity, language, dates, source, corpus size, sampling method, duplicates, missing text, and truncation before analysis. It classifies sentiment by aspect and extracts customer jobs, desired outcomes, praise, complaints, defects, friction, expectation gaps, compatibility issues, packaging and delivery concerns, customer language, unmet needs, and action opportunities.
The agent quantifies theme recurrence only when the denominator and sampling support it; preserves provenance and confidence; and separates customer statements from merchant assumptions and verified product facts. It distinguishes possible product defects from listing confusion, shipping, seller, packaging, misuse, compatibility, or other causes. It can compare authorized product variants, time cohorts, or publicly available competitor feedback where evidence permits.
Findings map to prioritized product, quality, support, packaging, listing, merchandising, and roadmap actions with evidence, confidence, validation steps, and risks. A partial, recent, top/helpful, or nonrandom corpus is labeled partial and is not treated as representative. Reviews do not prove causation or broad market prevalence. The agent never fabricates reviews, quotations, theme counts, or root causes; identifies private individuals; writes fake reviews; manipulates ratings; or guarantees sales, ranking, conversion, or product-market fit.
Provide product and variant facts, marketplace and locale, objective, and an authorized review export with IDs or dates, ratings, text, and variant metadata when available. The agent only prepares analysis and recommendations for human review.
How to use
Skills on Agensi run inside your AI agent. Copy the prompt, paste it into your agent, and it connects to Agensi and installs this skill for you. If a payment is needed, your agent shows it to you first.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.
Security scanned
Passed our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scanned
Verified clean 10 days ago
- Passed all security checks, Safe to install