Works with the AI tools you already use

    CClaude CodeCCursorCCodex CLIGGitHub CopilotGGemini CLIVVS CodeWWindsurf+15 more

    AI Stack Spend Audit

    by PubsProToolkit

    1

    List your AI subscriptions and usage; it finds the overlap and returns a cut/keep/downgrade verdict with estimated monthly dollar savings.

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    0 installsSecurity scanned

    See it in action

    You say

    Audit my AI stack. I pay for: ChatGPT Plus $20/mo (daily, writing + research), Claude Pro $20/mo (daily, writing + coding help), Perplexity Pro $20/mo (a few searches a week), Cursor $20/mo (I code in it daily), Jasper $49/mo (occasional marketing copy), Midjourney $10/mo (a couple images a month), ElevenLabs $22/mo (weekly voiceovers). What should I cut, keep, or downgrade?

    Your agent does

    Current spend: $161/month ($1,932/year).

    Overlap groups:

    • General assistant: ChatGPT (keeper), Claude. Both daily; you use Claude for coding help and ChatGPT for writing+research — close call, but two general assistants is the classic overlap.
    • Research: Perplexity vs ChatGPT/Claude web. Light usage.
    • Writing suite: Jasper vs your general assistants.
    • Coding IDE: Cursor (no overlap). Image: Midjourney (light). Voice: ElevenLabs (no overlap).

    Verdicts:

    • ChatGPT Plus — KEEP. $0. Primary daily driver for writing + research.
    • Claude Pro — DOWNGRADE/KEEP your call. You use it daily for coding help; if you keep ChatGPT, consider dropping to free tier for spot use. Potential −$20/mo if cut.
    • Perplexity Pro — CUT. −$20/mo. A few searches/week are covered by ChatGPT/Claude web.
    • Cursor — KEEP. $0. In-IDE coding isn't replaced by a chat assistant; used daily.
    • Jasper — CUT. −$49/mo. Occasional marketing copy is well within a general assistant's reach.
    • Midjourney — DOWNGRADE. Already lowest tier; keep if you value image quality, else CUT −$10/mo.
    • ElevenLabs — KEEP. $0. Voice has no substitute in your kept tools.

    Bottom line (conservative, confirmed cuts only): −$69/month = −$828/year (Perplexity $20 + Jasper $49). Optional further cuts (Claude $20, Midjourney $10) could reach −$99/month.

    Shareable summary: "This AI Stack Spend Audit found $69/month in redundant AI spend — $828/year."

    Assumptions: prices user-stated; verify each cut won't break a workflow before cancelling. Not financial advice.

    What you get

    Cut a $100-300/month AI subscription billFind redundant AI tools that overlapDecide which AI subscriptions to keepQuarterly review of an AI tool stack

    About this skill

    Most AI power users now quietly spend $100–300/month spread across ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, Perplexity, ElevenLabs, Midjourney, and a half-dozen others — and suspect they're wasting money on tools that overlap. This skill turns that messy pile of subscriptions into a clear, itemized cut/keep/downgrade plan with a real dollar figure attached.

    How it works:

    1. Intake — You list each tool, its plan tier, monthly price, and how you actually use it (the skill asks one quick round of follow-ups if anything's missing).
    2. Capability mapping — Each tool is bucketed by the job you hire it for, using a built-in capability map. This is where the redundancy hides: a general assistant you already pay for often covers the text jobs of separate writing and research tools.
    3. Overlap detection — Within each job group it picks the strongest "keeper" and flags the redundant payers, with explicit rules for when a general assistant can (and can't) absorb another tool's job — it won't, for example, pretend Claude replaces in-IDE coding, pro-grade image generation, or voice models.
    4. Verdict — Every tool gets a CUT, KEEP, or DOWNGRADE call with a one-line reason and a dollar impact, plus downgrade paths like cheaper tiers, annual billing, or free plans.
    5. Bottom line — A line-by-line monthly and annual savings total, plus a shareable summary line ("This audit found $87/month in redundant AI spend").

    The savings number is deliberately conservative and traceable: it uses only the prices you provide, flags anything unknown separately, and never inflates the headline. It's budgeting guidance for your own tools — not financial advice — designed to pay for itself in the first month.

    What's included: a lean SKILL.md orchestrator plus a bundled REFERENCE.md containing the tool capability map, the overlap-detection logic, the cut/keep/downgrade rubric, and a ready-to-fill report template.

    How to install

    Drop the file into your AI Agent. Works with Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, and 20+ more.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill passes our trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Passed our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    30-day refund

    Not a fit? Get your money back

    Trust & safety

    Security scanned

    Verified clean 1 month ago

    Listed1 month ago

    Creator

    PubsProToolkit builds rigor-first skills for AI agents — they write your docs and content properly, then adversarially review them to catch what's wrong before it ships. The result: cleaner output and a hard quality gate in one toolkit. Built by a CMPP-certified, PhD medical writer who brings regulated-industry standards to developer docs, content, compliance, and research integrity.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Popular in Productivity