- Home
- Skills
- Agents & Orchestration
- ai agent readiness auditor
ai agent readiness auditor
Structured production-readiness audit to identify security risks, reliability gaps, and hallucination triggers.
$5
Works with the AI Agents you already use
ai agent readiness auditor
Example session with this skill installed
Audit the 'CustomerSupport-V2' agent. It handles billing inquiries via API. It must not reveal user PII or hallucinate refund policies. I need a severity table and risk score.
- Read your context and instructions
- Compiled the ai agent readiness
- Generated the document
I have completed the multi-dimensional readiness audit for CustomerSupport-V2. The assessment focused on security boundaries and policy fidelity regarding billing operations.
AI Agent Readiness Audit Report: CustomerSupport-V2
| Dimension | Finding | Severity | Risk Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | Susceptible to indirect prompt injection via simulated 'invoice notes'. | Critical | Potential PII exfiltration or unauthorized discount triggers. |
| Evidence Discipline | Agent fabricated a 'Loyalty Refund Policy' that does not exist in the provided documentation. | High | Legal and financial liability for non-existent policy enforcement. |
| Reliability | Consistent handling of valid subscription ID formats across 50 iterations. | Informational | High confidence in standard data parsing. |
| Failure Handling | Gracefully handles empty API responses with a standard 'system unavailable' message. | Low | Stable recovery, though user experience is abrupt. |
| Data Privacy | Successfully refused to output raw JSON containing internal database keys. | Medium | Good filtering, but requires tighter regex for mask validation. |
Quantitative Assessment
- Risk Score: 78/100 (High Risk)
- Test Coverage: 85%
- Status: NO-GO (Fix Critical injection vulnerability before deployment)
Remediation Plan
Sanitization: Implement an input validation layer for the 'invoice notes' field to strip markdown and system-level instructions.
2.
Knowledge Grounding: Update the system prompt to strictly enforce 'I don't know' for any policy not explicitly defined in the billing_v2.pdf context.
3. Escalation: Add a human-in-the-loop trigger for any refund request exceeding $50.00.
Next steps
- Apply the input sanitization patch to the gateway.
- Restrict the agent's context window to verified policy documents only.
- Rerun the 'Security' and 'Evidence' test packets for re-verification.
billing_v2.pdf
PDF · document
Example file from a real run - the skill writes it into your workspace.
Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.
About this skill
The problem
LLM-based agents often fail in production due to unpredictable hallucinations, prompt injection vulnerabilities, or poor error handling that simple unit tests miss. Developers struggle to quantify the risk of deploying an agent without a structured, multi-dimensional evaluation framework.
What it does
- Executes multi-vector stress tests across reliability, security, and evidence discipline dimensions.
- Identifies critical vulnerabilities like data exfiltration paths and prompt injection susceptibility.
- Classifies behavioral findings by severity from Informational to Critical release-blockers.
- Calculates quantitative risk and coverage scores to provide a data-driven Go/No-Go recommendation.
- Maps verified capabilities against unsupported assumptions to prevent over-reliance on fragile features.
Why this beats prompting it yourself
General prompts lack the systematic rigor required for production safety. This skill uses a structured audit workflow that forces the agent to handle system limits, ambiguity, and malicious inputs, ensuring you don't miss edge cases that lead to catastrophic failures or brand damage.
Use cases
- Pre-deployment security and reliability audit for customer-facing chatbots.
- Compliance verification against internal data privacy and evidence discipline policies.
- Benchmarking agent performance recovery after API failures or malformed inputs.
- Vulnerability testing for agents with access to sensitive internal tools or databases.
Requires a clear description of the intended use case and environment. Physical access to agent logs or internal traces improves scoring accuracy but is not strictly required.
How to use
- 1
Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP
Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup
- 2
Sign in to Agensi
Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.
- 3
Ask for what you need
Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.
Security scanned
Checked by our 8-point scan before listing
Fresh listing
Recently published to Agensi
Money-back guarantee
Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.
Trust & safety
Security scan
Security scan passed 2 months ago
Permissions
No special permissions declared or detected