Accessibility & Inclusive Design Review (WCAG 2.2)

    1

    WCAG 2.2 AA review with measured contrast ratios, target-size math and a dev-ready remediation table.

    $7

    Secure checkout via Stripe

    Money-back guarantee

    Converts to your local currency at checkout

    Security scanned

    Works with the AI Agents you already use

    Claude CodeClaude CodeCursorCursorCodex CLICodex CLIMuseMuseDotsDots+21 more

    Accessibility & Inclusive Design Review (WCAG 2.2)

    Example session with this skill installed

    Run an accessibility audit on this login form screenshot. Target WCAG 2.2 AA. The audience is general public, including elderly users.

    • Read your context and instructions
    • Compiled the accessibility & inclusive

    I have completed the accessibility review for the login form. The design currently fails WCAG 2.2 AA due to 2 Critical and 1 Serious barrier.

    Accessibility Remediation Report

    Executive Summary: Does not meet WCAG 2.2 AA. Found 2 Critical and 1 Serious barriers. Primary issues involve contrast and target size.

    IDCriterionLocationBarrierSeverityFixEffort
    11.4.3 Contrast (Min)"Forgot Password" linkLight grey on white (2.1:1). Users with low vision cannot read the link.CriticalChange color from #A0A0A0 to #656565 (4.6:1 ratio).Low (CSS)
    22.5.8 Target SizeCheckbox for "Remember Me"Target is 16x16px. Users with motor impairments will struggle to tap.SeriousIncrease touch target area to 24x24px minimum or add 8px padding.Low (CSS)
    33.3.2 Labels/InstructionsEmail/Password fieldsPlaceholder text used instead of labels. Screen readers may skip fields.CriticalAdd visible <label> elements programmatically linked via for/id.Med (HTML)
    41.1.1 Non-text ContentSubmit Arrow IconMissing accessible name. Screen reader hears "Button".ModerateAdd aria-label="Sign In" to the button element.Low (HTML)

    Contrast Analysis

    • Primary Button: #0055FF on white (5.2:1) - PASS
    • Error Text: #FF0000 on white (4.0:1) - FAIL. Suggested fix: #D90000 (4.5:1).

    Inclusive & Cognitive Review

    • Reading Level: Grade 6. Suitable for general public and elderly users.

    Inclusive Design: The form uses a binary "Gender" dropdown (Optional). Recommendation: Change to open text or add "Non-binary/Prefer not to say".

    Next steps

    1. Update the CSS for the "Forgot Password" link and Error text using the suggested HEX codes.
    2. Wrap input fields in standard label tags to ensure screen reader compatibility.
    3. Test the updated form with a keyboard-only user to verify focus styles.

    Connects securely to your tools. The creator never sees your data.

    About this skill

    The problem

    Automated accessibility tools only catch about 30% of failures. Designers and developers struggle to manually verify WCAG 2.2 compliance, cognitive load, and inclusive UX without deep specialized knowledge.

    What it does

    • Performs detailed audits against WCAG 2.2 AA standards including Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust criteria.
    • Calculates exact color contrast ratios and provides specific HEX code corrections that meet thresholds while maintaining brand hue.
    • Evaluates physical interaction barriers like target sizes (24x24px / 44x44px) and single-pointer alternatives for dragging.
    • Analyzes non-technical factors like reading level, cognitive load, and inclusive content patterns for gender or names.
    • Generates a prioritized remediation table with specific severity ratings, implementation fixes, and assigned owners.

    Why this beats prompting it yourself

    Generic prompts often miss the nuances of WCAG 2.2's newest criteria or fail to provide actionable math for contrast and target sizes. This skill uses a systematic checklist and specific templates to ensure no barrier is skipped, providing the exact alt-text and code-level fixes a developer needs to ship.

    Use cases

    • Reviewing Figma screenshots or handoff files before development begins.
    • Auditing existing HTML pages or component libraries for ADA and Section 508 compliance.
    • Checking K-12 educational software for age-appropriate reading levels and cognitive load.
    • Ensuring mobile app touch targets and motion settings are inclusive for all users.

    Known limitations

    Cannot evaluate focus order, ARIA attributes, or reflow behavior from static screenshots. This review is a technical audit, not a legal opinion for compliance certification.

    Cannot evaluate dynamic behavior (focus order, screen reader announcements) from static images. Provides technical guidance, not legal certification.

    How to use

    1. 1

      Connect your agent to the Agensi MCP

      Copy the prompt and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any agent that supports MCP. It sets up the connection for you. Manual setup

    2. 2

      Sign in to Agensi

      Your agent shows a sign-in link. Sign in and click Allow.

    3. 3

      Ask for what you need

      Your agent loads this skill and uses it on your task. It always asks before any payment.

    Reviews

    No reviews yet

    Be one of the first to try it. Every listed skill goes through the trust checks below.

    Security scanned

    Checked by our 8-point scan before listing

    Fresh listing

    Recently published to Agensi

    Money-back guarantee

    Doesn't do what its page promises? You get your money back.

    Trust & safety

    Security scan

    Security scan passed 1 month ago

    Permissions

    No special permissions declared or detected

    Listed1 month ago

    What's inside

    Frequently Asked Questions

    This skill specifically audits for WCAG 2.2 AA standards, including newer requirements like target size minimums and dragging movements, while providing exact mathematical corrections for contrast and layout.

    For best results, provide high-resolution screenshots, Figma exports, or live URLs; however, please note that static images cannot be used to evaluate interactive elements like tab order or ARIA labels.

    The review generates a structured remediation table that includes the specific WCAG failure, a severity rating, a developer-ready fix, and the mathematical target for the correction.

    While this skill provides a highly technical and systematic audit to help you meet ADA and Section 508 standards, it is a design tool and does not constitute a legal certification of compliance.

    Yes, the skill is designed to handle individual UI components, full-page layouts, and even complex educational content to ensure inclusive reading levels and low cognitive load.

    New in UX & UI Design